↓ Skip to main content

Danger signals from mitochondrial DAMPS in trauma and post-injury sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Danger signals from mitochondrial DAMPS in trauma and post-injury sepsis
Published in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00068-018-0963-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. J. Hauser, L. E. Otterbein

Abstract

In all multicellular organisms, immediate host responses to both sterile and infective threat are initiated by very primitive systems now grouped together under the general term 'danger responses'. Danger signals are generated when primitive 'pattern recognition receptors' (PRR) encounter activating 'alarmins'. These molecular species may be of pathogenic infective origin (pathogen-associated molecular patterns) or of sterile endogenous origin (danger-associated molecular patterns). There are many sterile and infective alarmins and there is considerable overlap in their ability to activate PRR, but in all cases the end result is inflammation. It is the overlap between sterile and infective signals acting via a relatively limited number of PRR that generally underlies the great clinical similarity we see between sterile and infective systemic inflammatory responses. Mitochondria (MT) are evolutionarily derived from bacteria, and thus they sit at the crossroads between sterile and infective danger signal pathways. Many of the molecular species in mitochondria are alarmins, and so the release of MT from injured cells results in a wide variety of inflammatory events. This paper discusses the known participation of MT in inflammation and reviews what is known about how the major.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 13 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2018.
All research outputs
#23,320,957
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
#200
of 275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,098
of 346,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 275 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them