↓ Skip to main content

Modeling biominerals formed by apatites and DNA

Overview of attention for article published in Biointerphases, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Modeling biominerals formed by apatites and DNA
Published in
Biointerphases, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1559-4106-8-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guillermo Revilla-López, Jordi Casanovas, Oscar Bertran, Pau Turon, Jordi Puiggalí, Carlos Alemán

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 4 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 25%
Engineering 2 10%
Materials Science 2 10%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,954,424
of 23,942,155 outputs
Outputs from Biointerphases
#153
of 544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,779
of 202,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biointerphases
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,942,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them