↓ Skip to main content

Correlated recovery of five lizard populations following eradication of invasive mammals

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Correlated recovery of five lizard populations following eradication of invasive mammals
Published in
Biological Invasions, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10530-013-0511-2
Authors

Joanne M. Monks, Adrian Monks, David R. Towns

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Mexico 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
New Zealand 1 3%
Unknown 30 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Student > Master 3 9%
Unspecified 3 9%
Other 8 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 71%
Unspecified 5 14%
Environmental Science 3 9%
Mathematics 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2018.
All research outputs
#11,541,739
of 12,985,916 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#1,325
of 1,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,247
of 271,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#46
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,985,916 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.