Title |
Sulphonylureas and cancer: a case–control study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Acta Diabetologica, December 2008
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00592-008-0083-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Matteo Monami, Caterina Lamanna, Daniela Balzi, Niccolò Marchionni, Edoardo Mannucci |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 2 | 2% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 94 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 16% |
Researcher | 16 | 16% |
Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Other | 23 | 23% |
Unknown | 18 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 40% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 8% |
Unknown | 23 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2024.
All research outputs
#5,603,135
of 25,920,652 outputs
Outputs from Acta Diabetologica
#206
of 1,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,709
of 181,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Diabetologica
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,920,652 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them