↓ Skip to main content

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD)

Overview of attention for article published in Neurosurgical Review, January 1993
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 258)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD)
Published in
Neurosurgical Review, January 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf00258242
Authors

H. Michael Mayer, Mario Brock

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 25%
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Other 4 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 90%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,882,853
of 13,133,585 outputs
Outputs from Neurosurgical Review
#32
of 258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,708
of 270,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurosurgical Review
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,133,585 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 258 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.