Title |
Quality Assessment of Stereoscopic Images
|
---|---|
Published in |
EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, January 2009
|
DOI | 10.1155/2008/659024 |
Authors |
Alexandre Benoit, Patrick Le Callet, Patrizio Campisi, Romain Cousseau |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | 2% |
Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
France | 2 | 2% |
Italy | 2 | 2% |
Brazil | 2 | 2% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
Singapore | 1 | <1% |
Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
China | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 101 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 32% |
Student > Master | 20 | 17% |
Researcher | 14 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
Professor | 8 | 7% |
Other | 21 | 18% |
Unknown | 7 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 44 | 38% |
Computer Science | 40 | 34% |
Psychology | 6 | 5% |
Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 3% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
Other | 9 | 8% |
Unknown | 12 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing
#56
of 233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,977
of 185,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 233 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.