Title |
Particle formation and risk of embolization during transseptal catheterization: comparison of standard transseptal needles and a new radiofrequency transseptal needle
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10840-010-9531-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gregory K. Feld, Jay Tiongson, Ganiyu Oshodi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 15 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 3 | 19% |
Student > Master | 3 | 19% |
Researcher | 3 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 19% |
Chemistry | 2 | 13% |
Engineering | 2 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 19% |
Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#5,620,968
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
#1
of 2 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,404
of 196,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one scored the same or higher as 1 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them