| Title |
Mechanical Asymmetry in the Embryonic Chick Heart During Looping
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Biomedical Engineering, December 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1114/1.1623487 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Evan A. Zamir, Varahoor Srinivasan, Renato Perucchio, Larry A. Taber |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 34% |
| Researcher | 15 | 24% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 17 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2014.
All research outputs
#8,784,015
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Biomedical Engineering
#390
of 1,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,643
of 144,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Biomedical Engineering
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.