↓ Skip to main content

Evidence-based review of biologic markers as indicators of disease progression and remission in rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Rheumatology International, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Evidence-based review of biologic markers as indicators of disease progression and remission in rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Rheumatology International, May 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00296-007-0357-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Emery, Cem Gabay, Maarten Kraan, Juan Gomez-Reino

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 24%
Other 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Unspecified 2 6%
Other 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 67%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 15%
Unspecified 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 2 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2017.
All research outputs
#3,490,517
of 12,196,902 outputs
Outputs from Rheumatology International
#297
of 1,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,083
of 259,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheumatology International
#14
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,196,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,166 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.