| Title |
Novel Radio Architectures for UWB, 60 GHz, and Cognitive Wireless Systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, March 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1155/wcn/2006/17957 |
| Authors |
Danijela Cabric, Mike SW Chen, David A Sobel, Stanley Wang, Jing Yang, Robert W Brodersen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| China | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 61% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 20 | 87% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2014.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
#104
of 549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,531
of 85,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 549 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.