Title |
Prevalence of swallowing complaints and clinical findings among 50–79-year-old men and women in an urban population
|
---|---|
Published in |
Dysphagia, December 1991
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf02493524 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sven Lindgren, Lars Janzon |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 19 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
Researcher | 6 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
Other | 20 | 20% |
Unknown | 34 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 29% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Linguistics | 2 | 2% |
Other | 10 | 10% |
Unknown | 35 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,484,692
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia
#229
of 1,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,297
of 62,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them