Title |
The Longitudinal Young’s Modulus of Cortical Bone in the Midshaft of Human Femur and its Correlation with CT Scanning Data
|
---|---|
Published in |
Calcified Tissue International, September 2003
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00223-002-2123-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
M. Cuppone, B. B. Seedhom, E. Berry, A. E. Ostell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 3 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Canada | 2 | 1% |
Greece | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 174 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 41 | 23% |
Student > Bachelor | 36 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 14% |
Researcher | 14 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 5% |
Other | 27 | 15% |
Unknown | 30 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 86 | 47% |
Materials Science | 18 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 8% |
Unknown | 42 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Calcified Tissue International
#594
of 1,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,755
of 56,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Calcified Tissue International
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.