| Title |
Is emphysema a risk factor for pneumothorax in CT-guided lung biopsy?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
SpringerPlus, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2193-1801-2-196 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nobuhiro Asai, Yasutaka Kawamura, Ikuo Yamazaki, Keiji Sogawa, Yoshihiro Ohkuni, Toshihiro O’uchi, Akihito Kubo, Etsuro Yamaguchi, Norihiro Kaneko |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 22% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 57% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,563,204
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#504
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,270
of 193,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#18
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.