Title |
Refractive outcomes comparison between the Lenstar LS 900® optical biometry and immersion A-scan ultrasound
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Ophthalmology, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10792-014-9970-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Palanyraj Naicker, Siva Sundralingam, Mohammadreza Peyman, Azida Juana, Nor Fadhilah Mohamad, Maung Maung Win, Angela Loo, Visvaraja Subrayan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 13% |
Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 8 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 54% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Psychology | 1 | 4% |
Engineering | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 8 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,563,204
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from International Ophthalmology
#129
of 1,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,750
of 227,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Ophthalmology
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,043 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.