↓ Skip to main content

Hamstring Injuries

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, January 1985
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

2 patents


150 Dimensions

Readers on

60 Mendeley
Hamstring Injuries
Published in
Sports Medicine, January 1985
DOI 10.2165/00007256-198502010-00003

James C. Agre

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 56 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Unspecified 8 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 13%
Other 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 18 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 30%
Unspecified 15 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 3 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2011.
All research outputs
of 12,577,945 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
of 2,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 275,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,577,945 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.