| Title |
Ginga-J: The procedural middleware for the Brazilian digital TV system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Brazilian Computer Society, March 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf03192401 |
| Authors |
Guido Lemos de Souza Filho, Luiz Eduardo Cunha Leite, Carlos Eduardo Coelho Freire Batista |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 5 | 16% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 24 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 19% |
| Professor | 4 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 2 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 19 | 61% |
| Engineering | 8 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 2 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2014.
All research outputs
#8,693,470
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Brazilian Computer Society
#15
of 66 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,853
of 91,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Brazilian Computer Society
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 66 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.