| Title |
Characterization of the products resulting from ethylene glycol liquefaction of cellulose
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wood Science, December 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00767898 |
| Authors |
Tatsuhiko Yamada, Hirokuni Ono |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 16 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 11 | 17% |
| Engineering | 9 | 14% |
| Materials Science | 9 | 14% |
| Chemical Engineering | 8 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,767,543
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wood Science
#19
of 217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,313
of 124,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wood Science
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them