| Title |
High-level classification of the Fungi and a tool for evolutionary ecological analyses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Fungal Diversity, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13225-018-0401-0 |
| Authors |
Leho Tedersoo, Santiago Sánchez-Ramírez, Urmas Kõljalg, Mohammad Bahram, Markus Döring, Dmitry Schigel, Tom May, Martin Ryberg, Kessy Abarenkov |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 4 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| Japan | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 57% |
| Scientists | 15 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 665 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 665 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 101 | 15% |
| Researcher | 84 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 83 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 73 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 38 | 6% |
| Other | 95 | 14% |
| Unknown | 191 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 239 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 83 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 58 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 2% |
| Engineering | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 46 | 7% |
| Unknown | 216 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,359,347
of 25,867,969 outputs
Outputs from Fungal Diversity
#15
of 308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,612
of 343,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fungal Diversity
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,867,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them