| Title |
Fingerprint-based crypto-biometric system for network security
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EURASIP Journal on Information Security, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13635-015-0020-1 |
| Authors |
Subhas Barman, Debasis Samanta, Samiran Chattopadhyay |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 17% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 32 | 46% |
| Engineering | 11 | 16% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Energy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2015.
All research outputs
#4,369,982
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from EURASIP Journal on Information Security
#13
of 81 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,427
of 279,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EURASIP Journal on Information Security
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 81 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them