↓ Skip to main content

Cooling strategies for cryogenic machining from a materials viewpoint

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Engineering & Performance, October 1992
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 231)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Cooling strategies for cryogenic machining from a materials viewpoint
Published in
Journal of Materials Engineering & Performance, October 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf02649248
Authors

Z. Zhao, S. Y. Hong

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 44 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 24%
Other 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Other 12 26%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 35 76%
Chemistry 1 2%
Energy 1 2%
Materials Science 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 6 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,638,252
of 14,110,318 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Engineering & Performance
#8
of 231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,857
of 274,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Engineering & Performance
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,110,318 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them