↓ Skip to main content

Model selection bias and Freedman’s paradox

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
160 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
281 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Model selection bias and Freedman’s paradox
Published in
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10463-009-0234-4
Authors

Paul M. Lukacs, Kenneth P. Burnham, David R. Anderson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 5%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Spain 3 1%
Brazil 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 242 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 81 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 27%
Student > Master 48 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Student > Postgraduate 13 5%
Other 48 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 141 50%
Environmental Science 58 21%
Unspecified 25 9%
Computer Science 10 4%
Mathematics 9 3%
Other 38 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2016.
All research outputs
#3,853,799
of 13,722,218 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics
#12
of 68 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,751
of 233,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,722,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 68 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them