| Title |
“Pedagogical tweeting” in higher education: boon or bane?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41239-018-0102-5 |
| Authors |
Britt Adams, Annelies Raes, Hannelore Montrieux, Tammy Schellens |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 15% |
| Belgium | 4 | 12% |
| Spain | 4 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 58% |
| Scientists | 11 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 13 | 12% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 10% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 23% |
| Unknown | 31 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 24 | 22% |
| Arts and Humanities | 10 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 22% |
| Unknown | 34 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,115,714
of 24,532,617 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#51
of 413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,766
of 333,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,532,617 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.