↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of an Attractor Neural Network’s Response to Conflicting External Inputs

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Analysis of an Attractor Neural Network’s Response to Conflicting External Inputs
Published in
The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13408-018-0061-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn Hedrick, Kechen Zhang

Abstract

The theory of attractor neural networks has been influential in our understanding of the neural processes underlying spatial, declarative, and episodic memory. Many theoretical studies focus on the inherent properties of an attractor, such as its structure and capacity. Relatively little is known about how an attractor neural network responds to external inputs, which often carry conflicting information about a stimulus. In this paper we analyze the behavior of an attractor neural network driven by two conflicting external inputs. Our focus is on analyzing the emergent properties of the megamap model, a quasi-continuous attractor network in which place cells are flexibly recombined to represent a large spatial environment. In this model, the system shows a sharp transition from the winner-take-all mode, which is characteristic of standard continuous attractor neural networks, to a combinatorial mode in which the equilibrium activity pattern combines embedded attractor states in response to conflicting external inputs. We derive a numerical test for determining the operational mode of the system a priori. We then derive a linear transformation from the full megamap model with thousands of neurons to a reduced 2-unit model that has similar qualitative behavior. Our analysis of the reduced model and explicit expressions relating the parameters of the reduced model to the megamap elucidate the conditions under which the combinatorial mode emerges and the dynamics in each mode given the relative strength of the attractor network and the relative strength of the two conflicting inputs. Although we focus on a particular attractor network model, we describe a set of conditions under which our analysis can be applied to more general attractor neural networks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 25%
Student > Master 5 21%
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 6 25%
Mathematics 5 21%
Engineering 2 8%
Computer Science 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 6 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2018.
All research outputs
#18,612,022
of 23,055,429 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience
#56
of 80 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,647
of 327,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,055,429 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them