↓ Skip to main content

Limnological reconnaissance of waterbodies in central and southern Nepal

Overview of attention for article published in Hydrobiologia, November 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Limnological reconnaissance of waterbodies in central and southern Nepal
Published in
Hydrobiologia, November 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf02392954
Authors

John R. Jones, Matthew F. Knowlton, Deep B. Swar

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Master 5 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Professor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 7 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2019.
All research outputs
#8,784,015
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Hydrobiologia
#1
of 5 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,266
of 14,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrobiologia
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.8. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.