↓ Skip to main content

Median nerve entrapment. pronator teres syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical & Radiologic Anatomy, December 1990
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 303)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Median nerve entrapment. pronator teres syndrome
Published in
Surgical & Radiologic Anatomy, December 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf01623702
Authors

FK Fuss, GH Wurzl

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Librarian 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 67%
Social Sciences 1 17%
Unspecified 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2012.
All research outputs
#3,654,865
of 12,566,415 outputs
Outputs from Surgical & Radiologic Anatomy
#44
of 303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,319
of 234,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical & Radiologic Anatomy
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,566,415 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 303 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.