↓ Skip to main content

Phytosanitary inspection of woody plants for planting at European Union entry points: a practical enquiry

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Phytosanitary inspection of woody plants for planting at European Union entry points: a practical enquiry
Published in
Biological Invasions, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10530-015-0883-6
Authors

René Eschen, Ludovic Rigaux, Lidia Sukovata, Anna Maria Vettraino, Mariella Marzano, Jean-Claude Grégoire

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 33%
Professor 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 50%
Environmental Science 2 33%
Unspecified 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2015.
All research outputs
#4,281,239
of 5,148,574 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#562
of 590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,003
of 177,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#33
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,148,574 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.