The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
A mechanism for cutting carbon nanotubes with a scanning tunneling microscope
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal de Physique I, September 2000
|
DOI | 10.1007/s100510070145 |
Authors |
A. Rubio, S.P. Apell, L.C. Venema, C. Dekker |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 25 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 50% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
Professor | 2 | 7% |
Researcher | 2 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy | 10 | 36% |
Engineering | 6 | 21% |
Chemistry | 4 | 14% |
Materials Science | 3 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2010.
All research outputs
#5,737,475
of 26,391,552 outputs
Outputs from Journal de Physique I
#276
of 1,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,567
of 38,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal de Physique I
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,391,552 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.