↓ Skip to main content

The host range of crown gall

Overview of attention for article published in Botanical Review, October 1976
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 160)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
18 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
468 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
The host range of crown gall
Published in
Botanical Review, October 1976
DOI 10.1007/bf02860827
Authors

Marcel De Cleene, Jozef De Ley

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
India 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 53 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 21%
Student > Master 11 19%
Researcher 11 19%
Student > Bachelor 10 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Other 8 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 64%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 26%
Unspecified 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2014.
All research outputs
#1,234,063
of 11,238,417 outputs
Outputs from Botanical Review
#6
of 160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,624
of 165,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Botanical Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,238,417 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them