↓ Skip to main content

Labels DO Matter! A Critique of AECT’s Redefinition of the Field

Overview of attention for article published in TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
Title
Labels DO Matter! A Critique of AECT’s Redefinition of the Field
Published in
TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, December 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11528-009-0362-y
Authors

Patrick Lowenthal, Brent G. Wilson

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 7%
Canada 2 2%
Mexico 1 1%
Nigeria 1 1%
Turkey 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Estonia 1 1%
Unknown 82 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 28%
Student > Master 13 14%
Researcher 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 54 56%
Arts and Humanities 10 10%
Computer Science 9 9%
Unspecified 8 8%
Philosophy 3 3%
Other 12 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2012.
All research outputs
#3,628,248
of 12,497,040 outputs
Outputs from TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning
#162
of 436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,865
of 234,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning
#7
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,497,040 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 436 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.