↓ Skip to main content

Tubal ectopic pregnancy: diagnosis and management

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Tubal ectopic pregnancy: diagnosis and management
Published in
Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00404-008-0731-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vivek Nama, Isaac Manyonda

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 70 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 24%
Student > Postgraduate 14 20%
Student > Master 14 20%
Unspecified 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 16 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 66%
Unspecified 7 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Psychology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 7 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2016.
All research outputs
#2,028,615
of 8,069,135 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics
#138
of 886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,724
of 220,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,069,135 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 61st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 886 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.