↓ Skip to main content

Point-of-care ultrasound in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism

Overview of attention for article published in The Ultrasound Journal, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
Title
Point-of-care ultrasound in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism
Published in
The Ultrasound Journal, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13089-015-0025-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandro Squizzato, Luca Galli, Victor E. A. Gerdes

Abstract

The best diagnostic strategy to confirm or exclude pulmonary embolism (PE) suspicion needs an appropriate combination of clinical assessment, plasma D-dimer measurement, and computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA). CTPA should be used with caution in some patient groups, such as patients with known allergy to contrast media, those with severe renal insufficiency, and pregnant women, and could be not immediately available in case of unstable patients. In the emergency setting, alternative diagnostic strategies should be implemented to overcome CTPA limitations. Ultrasonography is certainly a valuable alternative diagnostic tool. In addition to echocardiography and lower limb compressive venous ultrasonography, lung ultrasound (US) may play an important role in selected patients' subgroups. Recent data on the diagnostic performance of a triple point-of-care US (lung, heart, and leg vein US) are discussed in the present paper, and pros and cons of triple point-of-care US are compared with those of standard diagnostic approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 132 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Postgraduate 15 11%
Researcher 10 7%
Other 31 22%
Unknown 26 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 68%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 32 23%