↓ Skip to main content

Comparison between thick level set (TLS) and cohesive zone models

Overview of attention for article published in Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Comparison between thick level set (TLS) and cohesive zone models
Published in
Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40323-015-0041-9
Authors

Andrés Parrilla Gómez, Nicolas Moës, Claude Stolz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 38%
Researcher 5 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 21 57%
Materials Science 6 16%
Unknown 10 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2018.
All research outputs
#15,508,366
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences
#24
of 61 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,274
of 263,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 61 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them