Title |
Effect of community-based soil and water conservation practices on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi types, spore densities, root colonization, and soil nutrients in the northern highlands of Ethiopia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, April 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40538-018-0121-4 |
Authors |
Mengistu Welemariam, Fassil Kebede, Bobe Bedadi, Emiru Birhane |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 22% |
Researcher | 6 | 13% |
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 13 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 36% |
Environmental Science | 11 | 24% |
Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 13 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2018.
All research outputs
#5,816,262
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
#15
of 126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,697
of 326,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them