↓ Skip to main content

Bedside Doppler ultrasound for the assessment of renal perfusion in the ICU: advantages and limitations of the available techniques

Overview of attention for article published in The Ultrasound Journal, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Bedside Doppler ultrasound for the assessment of renal perfusion in the ICU: advantages and limitations of the available techniques
Published in
The Ultrasound Journal, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13089-015-0024-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Schnell, Michael Darmon

Abstract

Three Doppler-derived techniques have been proposed to assess renal perfusion at bedside: Doppler-based renal resistive index (RI) which has been extensively but imperfectly studied in assessing renal allograft status and changes in renal perfusion in critically ill patients and for predicting the reversibility of an acute kidney injury (AKI), semi-quantitative evaluation of renal perfusion using colour-Doppler which may be easier to perform and may give similar information than RI and contrast-enhanced sonography that may allow more precise renal and cortical perfusion assessment. These promising tools have several obvious advantages including their feasibility, non-invasiveness, repeatability and potential interest in assessing renal function or perfusion. However, several limits need to be taken into account with these techniques, and promising results remain associated with large areas of uncertainty. This editorial will describe more carefully advantages and limits of these techniques and will discuss their potential interest in assessing renal perfusion.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 75 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Postgraduate 11 14%
Other 10 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 68%
Engineering 2 3%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 16 21%