↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of Mechanical Thrombectomy Using Stent Retriever and Balloon-Guiding Catheter

Overview of attention for article published in CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of Mechanical Thrombectomy Using Stent Retriever and Balloon-Guiding Catheter
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00270-018-1901-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Kammerer, R. du Mesnil de Rochemont, M. Wagner, S. -J. You, S. Tritt, M. Mueller-Eschner, F. C. Keil, A. Lauer, J. Berkefeld

Abstract

Intra-arterial therapy of acute ischemic stroke has developed rapidly in recent years. Due to proven efficacy in randomized trials, stent retrievers were replacing first-generation thrombectomy devices and have been defined as method of choice. However, aspiration catheters or a combination of several techniques have shown promising rates of successful recanalizations. To create a basis for comparison of the new approaches according to real-world data, we determined the first pass recanalization rate of an evidence-based standard technique with the use of a stent retriever in combination with a balloon-guiding catheter. The assessment was based on the number of required passages and reperfusion rate, but not on clinical results. Patients from our institution with anterior circulation occlusions and mechanical thrombectomy by using stent retrievers in combination with balloon-guiding catheters were analyzed retrospectively. Reperfusion was graded with the "thrombolysis in cerebral infarction" (TICI) classification on post-interventional angiograms. Additionally, the number of passes and the duration of the recanalization procedure were recorded. Between 2014 and July 2017, 201 patients met the inclusion criteria. Successful recanalization, defined as a TICI scale 2b/3, was 91% (TICI 2b was achieved in 44% and TICI 3 in 47%) after the procedure. After the first passage, successful recanalization was achieved in 65% of the patients. Mean number of passes was 1.4 (1-5 passes) for all patients. Median duration of the procedure was 49 min (0:11-2:35 h). Even a standard thrombectomy technique with the use of a stent retriever together with a balloon-guiding catheter provides reasonable recanalization rates with only one passage. The results can be taken as benchmark for alternative and more complex techniques.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 10 26%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 14 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,375,196
of 24,532,617 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#228
of 2,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,566
of 335,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#9
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,532,617 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,607 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.