↓ Skip to main content

ddpcRquant: threshold determination for single channel droplet digital PCR experiments

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
Title
ddpcRquant: threshold determination for single channel droplet digital PCR experiments
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00216-015-8773-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wim Trypsteen, Matthijs Vynck, Jan De Neve, Pawel Bonczkowski, Maja Kiselinova, Eva Malatinkova, Karen Vervisch, Olivier Thas, Linos Vandekerckhove, Ward De Spiegelaere

Abstract

Digital PCR is rapidly gaining interest in the field of molecular biology for absolute quantification of nucleic acids. However, the first generation of platforms still needs careful validation and requires a specific methodology for data analysis to distinguish negative from positive signals by defining a threshold value. The currently described methods to assess droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) are based on an underlying assumption that the fluorescent signal of droplets is normally distributed. We show that this normality assumption does not likely hold true for most ddPCR runs, resulting in an erroneous threshold. We suggest a methodology that does not make any assumptions about the distribution of the fluorescence readouts. A threshold is estimated by modelling the extreme values in the negative droplet population using extreme value theory. Furthermore, the method takes shifts in baseline fluorescence between samples into account. An R implementation of our method is available, allowing automated threshold determination for absolute ddPCR quantification using a single fluorescent reporter.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 151 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 27%
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Other 7 5%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 31 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 8%
Engineering 10 6%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 34 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2021.
All research outputs
#3,857,137
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#473
of 9,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,483
of 280,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#10
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,749 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.