↓ Skip to main content

A Formalism for Evaluating Analytically the Cross-Correlation Structure of a Firing-Rate Network Model

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A Formalism for Evaluating Analytically the Cross-Correlation Structure of a Firing-Rate Network Model
Published in
The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13408-015-0020-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diego Fasoli, Olivier Faugeras, Stefano Panzeri

Abstract

We introduce a new formalism for evaluating analytically the cross-correlation structure of a finite-size firing-rate network with recurrent connections. The analysis performs a first-order perturbative expansion of neural activity equations that include three different sources of randomness: the background noise of the membrane potentials, their initial conditions, and the distribution of the recurrent synaptic weights. This allows the analytical quantification of the relationship between anatomical and functional connectivity, i.e. of how the synaptic connections determine the statistical dependencies at any order among different neurons. The technique we develop is general, but for simplicity and clarity we demonstrate its efficacy by applying it to the case of synaptic connections described by regular graphs. The analytical equations so obtained reveal previously unknown behaviors of recurrent firing-rate networks, especially on how correlations are modified by the external input, by the finite size of the network, by the density of the anatomical connections and by correlation in sources of randomness. In particular, we show that a strong input can make the neurons almost independent, suggesting that functional connectivity does not depend only on the static anatomical connectivity, but also on the external inputs. Moreover we prove that in general it is not possible to find a mean-field description à la Sznitman of the network, if the anatomical connections are too sparse or our three sources of variability are correlated. To conclude, we show a very counterintuitive phenomenon, which we call stochastic synchronization, through which neurons become almost perfectly correlated even if the sources of randomness are independent. Due to its ability to quantify how activity of individual neurons and the correlation among them depends upon external inputs, the formalism introduced here can serve as a basis for exploring analytically the computational capability of population codes expressed by recurrent neural networks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 5%
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 20 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 41%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 32%
Neuroscience 4 18%
Mathematics 3 14%
Engineering 3 14%
Psychology 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2015.
All research outputs
#15,333,503
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience
#35
of 80 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,924
of 261,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.