↓ Skip to main content

The significance of macrophage polarization subtypes for animal models of tissue fibrosis and human fibrotic diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Medicine, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The significance of macrophage polarization subtypes for animal models of tissue fibrosis and human fibrotic diseases
Published in
Clinical and Translational Medicine, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40169-015-0047-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter J Wermuth, Sergio A Jimenez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 205 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 24%
Researcher 23 11%
Student > Master 23 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Other 15 7%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 46 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 18 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 54 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,455,082
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#292
of 1,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,002
of 366,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.