↓ Skip to main content

GMP-compliant 68Ga radiolabelling in a conventional small-scale radiopharmacy: a feasible approach for routine clinical use

Overview of attention for article published in EJNMMI Research, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
GMP-compliant 68Ga radiolabelling in a conventional small-scale radiopharmacy: a feasible approach for routine clinical use
Published in
EJNMMI Research, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13550-015-0105-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roeland Vis, Jules Lavalaye, Ewoudt MW van de Garde

Abstract

The number of routine care patient examinations with (68)Ga radiopharmaceuticals is still relatively limited, probably caused by the presumed need for large investments in hot cells, automated synthesis modules, laboratory equipment and validation efforts. Our aim was to set up the preparation of (68)Ga-DOTA-NOC in compliance with all current European Union-Good Manufacturing Practices (EU-GMP), current Good Radiopharmacy Practice (cGRPP) and European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) guidance but without the availability of a hot cell and gas chromatography (GC), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) equipment. A risk-based approach was applied to align preparation conditions with applicable regulations, together with a validation of a thin-layer chromatography (ITLC) method to replace HPLC as modality for examining radiochemical purity. Using an internally shielded labelling module for manual operation, a (68)Ga-DOTA-NOC labelling procedure was set up that meets all applicable Ph. Eur. specifications. The applied ITLC method showed very good correlation with HPLC results (r = 0.961) and was able to detect relevant deviations in radiolabelling procedures. All identified quality assurance aspects were made compliant with EU-GMP and cGRPP guidance. We consider the described configuration and validation approach feasible for many conventional small-scale radiopharmacies, something that could help to increase the availability of (68)Ga radiopharmaceuticals to a large number of patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Other 7 11%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 16 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 9 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2015.
All research outputs
#17,756,606
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Research
#310
of 556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,693
of 265,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Research
#13
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 556 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.