↓ Skip to main content

Six new species of Begonia (Begoniaceae) from limestone areas in Northern Vietnam

Overview of attention for article published in Botanical Studies, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 189)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
162 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Six new species of Begonia (Begoniaceae) from limestone areas in Northern Vietnam
Published in
Botanical Studies, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40529-015-0089-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ching-I Peng, Che-Wei Lin, Hsun-An Yang, Yoshiko Kono, Hieu Quang Nguyen

Abstract

Species of Begonia are richly represented in limestone karst areas across the Sino-Vietnamese border. More than one hundred species were known, many of which were documented recently. In continuation of our systematic studies of Asian Begonia, we report six species of Begonia that are unknown to science, namely B. caobangensis [sect. Platycentrum], B. circularis, B. melanobullata, B. langsonensis, B.locii and B. montaniformis [sect. Coelocentrum] from Northern Vietnam. Diagnostic features that separate them from morphologically allied species are provided. Somatic chromosome numbers were determined, which supports their placement in the respective sections. Foliar SEM microphotographs were taken and described. A careful study of the literature, herbarium specimens and living plants, both in the wild and in cultivation in the experimental greenhouse, supports the recognition of the six new species, which are described and illustrated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 162 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 20%
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 4 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 55%
Environmental Science 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 125. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2023.
All research outputs
#340,300
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Botanical Studies
#1
of 189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,577
of 279,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Botanical Studies
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 189 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them