| Title |
Transversalis fascia plane block, a novel ultrasound-guided abdominal wall nerve block
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12630-009-9110-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter D. Hebbard |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 24% |
| Unknown | 19 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 66% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 24 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1,392
of 2,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,083
of 125,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.