How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm

RT @InsanEvrim: 13. Bu tartışmaların yapılmıyor olması, toplumsal politikaların belirlenmesinde pekala yarardan çok zarar getirebilir. http…

@robertwagner198 Zumindest dürfte unstrittig sein: die Debatte ist ideologisch aufgeladen. So erklärt sich zwanglos die geringe Anzahl seriöser Wissenschaftler, die ihre Karriere an dieses verminte Forschungsgebiet knüpfen möchten. Es bietet sich auch die

@Z_o_y_a__ @eyeslasho So why would it be out of the question, or even far fetched, that psychological differences exist as well? [source for original quote: https://t.co/uEiJHwDodY]

@_helde @notyourchoice77 @King985962 @amhjr1978 @lporiginalg https://t.co/O7A5FRKd6e

@haydenblowery @decolonialcommi https://t.co/JB7OeUvKtJ

RT @PaoloShirasi: "The belief that stifling debate around race, genes and IQ is necessary to prevent harm has led to scholars being mischar…

RT @PaoloShirasi: "The belief that stifling debate around race, genes and IQ is necessary to prevent harm has led to scholars being mischar…

RT @PaoloShirasi: "The belief that stifling debate around race, genes and IQ is necessary to prevent harm has led to scholars being mischar…

@paulg @jakemcgraw Published just earlier this year - https://t.co/CrhzKHxmlW seems like the barriers to more research have less to do with irrational taboo, and more to do with using ill-defined concepts like 'race', as another reply said. Eg of this

13. Bu tartışmaların yapılmıyor olması, toplumsal politikaların belirlenmesinde pekala yarardan çok zarar getirebilir. https://t.co/xPLUSNuF3W

@PReconciliatio1 @BlanchardPhD Although an unrelated topic, I think this paper underscores some very real problems with stifling investigation on scientific questions: https://t.co/WRIV2EKTnp

@mw_josiah @DavidNdii How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm https://t.co/e2wDsIUfvF

RT @NoahCarl90: @TellYourSonThis Or this: https://t.co/9oyRrERyVU

@dondero_e @poutinecurd @NoahCarl90 So hard to tell these days, without knowing something about the author. The article he subsequently linked to is very well argued: https://t.co/KHySH0Upvf

RT @NoahCarl90: @TellYourSonThis Or this: https://t.co/9oyRrERyVU

@TellYourSonThis Or this: https://t.co/9oyRrERyVU

I think people should focus on making arguments about the significance of IQ measurements and what rights it should or shouldn’t afford, rather than make race based studies on the same. You’ll then remain scientifically relevant by excluding all people bel

@xavierbonilla87 FYI https://t.co/hUQPmpCj2u

RT @otammisalo: Jos tarkoitus on ratkoa yhteiskunnallisia ongelmia, tietämättömyys tuskin on hyvä strategia. https://t.co/cp9r1lp4rR https…

Jos tarkoitus on ratkoa yhteiskunnallisia ongelmia, tietämättömyys tuskin on hyvä strategia. https://t.co/cp9r1lp4rR https://t.co/f4bE6LjIbw

@EPoe187 @rasmansa It's amazing what he does. I prefer to recommend an article by Noah Carl on the subject. I think it is well known. https://t.co/38qHZ6rRNg

RT @XiXiDu: How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm https://t.co/1IoWuMFaFs By equating scientific statements with racis…

@exploringwhite @PhBased @NGreement @ConceptualJames @Paulcrofts @PriyamvadaGopal https://t.co/SU3XT6PFDQ It's a debate, and all the reasons to be careful, but continue, are in these links.

RT @a_centrism: Because many mainstream scientific findings on intelligence and race “threaten the sacred value of biological sameness betw…

https://t.co/98zVwNLeeB

@raphaccunha About Sapolsky: good for him. That's n=1 though. Did you take a look at this?: https://t.co/SOWSr75b8b

More examples here (harassment by fellow researchers, defamation, having to walk around with bodyguards): https://t.co/SOWSr75b8b 4/

@b9n10nt @JeffreyASachs Here is a discussion of the topic: https://t.co/P2uQWYVRmX

https://t.co/KX5QJy0gSi

RT @NoahCarl90: @kph3k Similar quotes from E.O. Wilson, Arthur Jensen, Herrnstein & Murray, Ernst Mayr and David Reich can be found in this…

RT @NoahCarl90: @kph3k Similar quotes from E.O. Wilson, Arthur Jensen, Herrnstein & Murray, Ernst Mayr and David Reich can be found in this…

RT @NoahCarl90: @kph3k Similar quotes from E.O. Wilson, Arthur Jensen, Herrnstein & Murray, Ernst Mayr and David Reich can be found in this…

RT @NoahCarl90: @kph3k Similar quotes from E.O. Wilson, Arthur Jensen, Herrnstein & Murray, Ernst Mayr and David Reich can be found in this…

How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm https://t.co/LGx4lRyYkw

RT @NoahCarl90: @kph3k Similar quotes from E.O. Wilson, Arthur Jensen, Herrnstein & Murray, Ernst Mayr and David Reich can be found in this…

RT @NoahCarl90: @kph3k Similar quotes from E.O. Wilson, Arthur Jensen, Herrnstein & Murray, Ernst Mayr and David Reich can be found in this…

RT @NoahCarl90: @kph3k Similar quotes from E.O. Wilson, Arthur Jensen, Herrnstein & Murray, Ernst Mayr and David Reich can be found in this…

@kph3k Similar quotes from E.O. Wilson, Arthur Jensen, Herrnstein & Murray, Ernst Mayr and David Reich can be found in this paper of mine from 2018: https://t.co/9oyRrERyVU

@Ananyo @Plinker14 @Biorealism @RickPhillipsFL @ewanbirney @nathancofnas I would also recommend this paper by yours truly: https://t.co/9oyRrERyVU

@victor_schleich @AharonHorenste1 @yaf https://t.co/Nbx1ElqxZI

RT @TOOEdit: Noah Carl: How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm https://t.co/8lWvufw6p0

RT @TOOEdit: Noah Carl: How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm https://t.co/8lWvufw6p0

RT @TOOEdit: Noah Carl: How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm https://t.co/8lWvufw6p0

RT @TOOEdit: Noah Carl: How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm https://t.co/8lWvufw6p0

RT @TOOEdit: Noah Carl: How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm https://t.co/8lWvufw6p0

@MrMaitra @charlesmurray The present thread just comprises incidents of censorious petitions or open letters signed by academics. I wrote about the attack on Charles Murray at Middlebury in this paper: https://t.co/9oyRrERyVU

RT @XiXiDu: How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm https://t.co/1IoWuMFaFs By equating scientific statements with racis…

@mvthomster @IvanIlyich3 @timmcguiness @EPoe187 @AndreaRoventini 3)Policies designed to mediate between grp. ineq. are more likely to be successful if they're based on an accurate understanding of the causes. 4)Here's an article about the potential harms

@Teige_MP @rolandfinn @weswpg @rasmansa @EPoe187 Here’s one that argues stifling such research may be doing more harm than good. https://t.co/GdmOHHzym2

How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm | SpringerLink https://t.co/lnjFT9enny

@philipcball @AngelaDSaini @GuardianBooks Hi Philip, you might find this paper of mine interesting: https://t.co/9oyRrERyVU

@matthewasears Not by coincidence, there is a whole section in one of Noah Carl’s papers (weakly argued). I suppose that is the source of this newish narrative, since the commonality among purveyors is eugenics and HBD involvement. https://t.co/rGJP4CeuE

@BenWinegard @matthewasears I know Noah Carl argues these propositions in this paper, but it’s a pretty shaky interpretation. You can’t use koan-like aphorisms or over-simplification to imply a narrative that blank slatism is responsible for millions of de

RT @TOOEdit: When predictable disastrous consequences of immigration and multiculturalism unfold, the liberals who deny biological influenc…

RT @TOOEdit: When predictable disastrous consequences of immigration and multiculturalism unfold, the liberals who deny biological influenc…

RT @TOOEdit: When predictable disastrous consequences of immigration and multiculturalism unfold, the liberals who deny biological influenc…

RT @TOOEdit: When predictable disastrous consequences of immigration and multiculturalism unfold, the liberals who deny biological influenc…

RT @TOOEdit: When predictable disastrous consequences of immigration and multiculturalism unfold, the liberals who deny biological influenc…

RT @TOOEdit: When predictable disastrous consequences of immigration and multiculturalism unfold, the liberals who deny biological influenc…

RT @TOOEdit: When predictable disastrous consequences of immigration and multiculturalism unfold, the liberals who deny biological influenc…

RT @NoahCarl90: @ImHardcory I made precisely this argument in paper that was characterised as "racist" by activists at the University of Ca…

RT @NoahCarl90: @ImHardcory I made precisely this argument in paper that was characterised as "racist" by activists at the University of Ca…

RT @TOOEdit: When predictable disastrous consequences of immigration and multiculturalism unfold, the liberals who deny biological influenc…

RT @TOOEdit: When predictable disastrous consequences of immigration and multiculturalism unfold, the liberals who deny biological influenc…

RT @TOOEdit: When predictable disastrous consequences of immigration and multiculturalism unfold, the liberals who deny biological influenc…

RT @NoahCarl90: @ImHardcory I made precisely this argument in paper that was characterised as "racist" by activists at the University of Ca…

RT @TOOEdit: When predictable disastrous consequences of immigration and multiculturalism unfold, the liberals who deny biological influenc…

RT @TOOEdit: When predictable disastrous consequences of immigration and multiculturalism unfold, the liberals who deny biological influenc…

RT @TOOEdit: When predictable disastrous consequences of immigration and multiculturalism unfold, the liberals who deny biological influenc…

RT @TOOEdit: When predictable disastrous consequences of immigration and multiculturalism unfold, the liberals who deny biological influenc…

RT @TOOEdit: When predictable disastrous consequences of immigration and multiculturalism unfold, the liberals who deny biological influenc…

RT @NoahCarl90: @ImHardcory I made precisely this argument in paper that was characterised as "racist" by activists at the University of Ca…

RT @NoahCarl90: @ImHardcory I made precisely this argument in paper that was characterised as "racist" by activists at the University of Ca…

@ImHardcory I made precisely this argument in paper that was characterised as "racist" by activists at the University of Cambridge: https://t.co/9oyRrERyVU

RT @JamesPsychol: How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm https://t.co/8yoZVfETJt

https://t.co/eYnb4RlVSD

Unpopular opinon: this article is insightful. https://t.co/uucnLg7Yaa

RT @koenfucius: How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm—an ethics research paper by @NoahCarl90, independent researcher s…

How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm—an ethics research paper by @NoahCarl90, independent researcher since being fired by St Edmunds College, Cambridge: https://t.co/lCPb5lOYFH

@BlackwaterRive2 @spikedonline I call this flirting https://t.co/e06z0YZrm0

RT @Katja_Thieme: Excellent points being made about the assumptions inherent in IQ research by people like #NoahCarl here: https://t.co/Pcu…

@phl43 @sc_cath @StEdmundsCam This paper https://t.co/Hu1DKTB91x has an insane level of self-victimization BS and never even try to start a statistical argument. It amazes me that conservatives try to fight academic SJW with even more pseudo-science and s

2/3 His paper( https://t.co/xykvZmU9sl) doesn't support this accusation&talks about debates on IQ,so what else was there?In what way the content he cites is diff from genetics papers out there?When you start firing people have responsab. to have Very s

RT @Katja_Thieme: Excellent points being made about the assumptions inherent in IQ research by people like #NoahCarl here: https://t.co/Pcu…

@McLoughlinShane ... 2/2 but establishing these "differences" should not warrant discrimination or oppression. Which throughout history has been the case: https://t.co/RAFR8JKD42

RT @XiXiDu: How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm https://t.co/1IoWuMFaFs By equating scientific statements with racis…

@logan2_jj @KreiviOrlok @ivanpuopolo @PaulaKSandberg @JaniErola @MatiasTurkkila @svuorikoski Kannattaa lukea tama: https://t.co/s15xCUeWgs

RT @CrombieDavide: (1) In light of the controversial appointment of #NoahCarl to a prestigious Cambridge position, we should review why the…

RT @Katja_Thieme: Excellent points being made about the assumptions inherent in IQ research by people like #NoahCarl here: https://t.co/Pcu…

@LilacMusk @Angerybunny @ringtrick It’s reasonable to be concerned with genetic determinism, or that social policy could be adversely influenced by intelligence research. But it’s irresponsible and potentially dangerous to misinterpret and deny science. Th

@ashesorbones @JeffreyASachs It also creates an untenable situation where our morals are held hostage to the facts. Good article on why we really out to re-think this. https://t.co/ZFYlSS9j4U https://t.co/QAiZXmax8X

How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm (2018) L: https://t.co/Rjit5PtZwj C: https://t.co/LvNfRanHH3

How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm (2018) https://t.co/oemYJgkZbW

@ashesorbones I hope the theory is tested. I think research on taboo subjects like this should be allowed without harassment. This scientist makes similar arguments as Pinker. https://t.co/ZFYlSS9j4U https://t.co/AsQjMSzqLL

If you don't agree with what someone says let's just call them names because hey, virtue signalling and stifling debate is far more important than having a discussion or examining evidence which may show an opposing view. https://t.co/B5DhqF9H4H

@jordanbpeterson @QuilletteM His paper is worth reading https://t.co/iBIVGbrwbg

How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm https://t.co/jHtXnVYNxL

@garethmacleod @davidgraeber @nntaleb Here is a paper he recently wrote. I just don’t see any evidence of support for eugenics at all. In fact the opposite. https://t.co/GdmOHHzym2

@t_watsit @gabriel_gabdiel @ItMeCallum @FluctibusFludd @GSpellchecker @Patreon Noah Carl is a researcher targeted by hundreds of academics outside his department for making arguments they dislike, like this one: https://t.co/D2x00Fg3bQ https://t.co/a4GaLPf

@SamHarrisOrg @QuilletteM https://t.co/RxOnHllgPj What do you make of this?