How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm https://t.co/daPuqPdzNJ #NoahCarl #Race #IQ #polqc
RT @XiXiDu: How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm https://t.co/1IoWuMFaFs By equating scientific statements with racis…
RT @LadyLibertyCunt: @FreePressGC @RealJeffHoliday @notch Noah Carl (who was recently protested by some rabid SJW professors, who tried to…
RT @nathancofnas: @bechhof @ronanfitz22 @juscallmekirsty Here's the paper that got him in trouble: https://t.co/szPnT02ScH
RT @LadyLibertyCunt: @FreePressGC @RealJeffHoliday @notch Noah Carl (who was recently protested by some rabid SJW professors, who tried to…
RT @LadyLibertyCunt: @FreePressGC @RealJeffHoliday @notch Noah Carl (who was recently protested by some rabid SJW professors, who tried to…
RT @LadyLibertyCunt: @FreePressGC @RealJeffHoliday @notch Noah Carl (who was recently protested by some rabid SJW professors, who tried to…
@FreePressGC @RealJeffHoliday @notch Noah Carl (who was recently protested by some rabid SJW professors, who tried to get him fired) makes some good points on this in a recent paper. https://t.co/SlHpry2l0K https://t.co/vZoqpzNpZ9
RT @StevenwithCats: Here is the work in question. IQ is not the best measure for intelligence. There are many articles that support that no…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
@bechhof @ronanfitz22 @juscallmekirsty Here's the paper that got him in trouble: https://t.co/szPnT02ScH
A link to Noah Carl #NoahCarl 's April 2018 paper pretty much laying out his whole position AFAICS. No one has responded to this paper in a way that would suggest they are a mensch let alone a proper academic . ;) condeming must have. https://t.co/V9SDaM7q
RT @Katja_Thieme: Excellent thread on the assumptions inherent in IQ research like that of #NoahCarl here. ⬇️ https://t.co/PcuhzsQRXH
Excellent points being made about the assumptions inherent in IQ research by people like #NoahCarl here: https://t.co/PcuhzsQRXH
RT @Katja_Thieme: Excellent thread on the assumptions inherent in IQ research like that of #NoahCarl here. ⬇️ https://t.co/PcuhzsQRXH
Excellent thread on the assumptions inherent in IQ research like that of #NoahCarl here. ⬇️
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
noah carl's big contribution is this essay (https://t.co/HrwECN4oaY) arguing that stifling racial-genetic-intelligence research is not a source of racist harm, and actually prevents a harm by making new knowledge available. it's a philosophy essay, and a b
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
https://t.co/290g50RVTz #race #genes #IQ #ethics #freespeech #academia #humanities #science #sciencedenial #blankslate #genetics #biology #research “when faced with...major social problems, a preference forignorance over knowledge is difficult to defend
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
I wonder how many of the signatories have actually read any of Carl's work. e.g. this one on "How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm" (which is heavily influenced by Steven Pinker) https://t.co/gKovWU9RAk
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
RT @clairlemon: Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychol…
Intelligence testing is **the most robust area** of psychological research. Most people who haven't had training in psychology don't know this (which is not their fault) but am genuinely astonished by the lack of epistemological humility. https://t.co/Zi6M
@DanaNaomyMills @katheder Here's a paper he actually wrote. You can read it if you like, and see whether your prejudice matches the evidence. https://t.co/Qq3gRcu1Jq
RT @toadmeister: @GerardHarbison @DAaronovitch Like this? https://t.co/lz7juk9R2f
RT @NeilThin: Streisand effect. Well argued and (now) very poignant piece by Noah Carl about weighing up the possible harms and benefits of…
RT @PiersBenn: This affair is scandalous. The article, possibly among others, by Dr Carl that provoked this witch hunt is here. It looks ve…
RT @NeilThin: Streisand effect. Well argued and (now) very poignant piece by Noah Carl about weighing up the possible harms and benefits of…
RT @NeilThin: Streisand effect. Well argued and (now) very poignant piece by Noah Carl about weighing up the possible harms and benefits of…
@DrEllaC You may be interested to know that the academic at the centre of this race/IQ debate cites the infamous Quilliam report in his so-called scholarship https://t.co/tEnk7cVeVZ
@AdamRutherford @toadmeister @QuilletteM @JonHaidt @jflier This, I assume, is the paper that's caused the reaction: https://t.co/tEnk7cVeVZ In it, he clearly advocates for race science. It's a bad paper full of bad arguments.
RT @NeilThin: Streisand effect. Well argued and (now) very poignant piece by Noah Carl about weighing up the possible harms and benefits of…
This affair is scandalous. The article, possibly among others, by Dr Carl that provoked this witch hunt is here. It looks very good to me and is *obviously* not an endorsement of racism. https://t.co/MjmJE73Oq7
Streisand effect. Well argued and (now) very poignant piece by Noah Carl about weighing up the possible harms and benefits of publishing and/or censoring research on socially 'taboo' topics. https://t.co/nbbRnWgv9d
@Cambridge_Uni #SaveNoahCarl #AcademicFreedom How unsurprising a professor who makes a good case for not stifling debate on difficult taboo subjects is next in line for the purge from those who would rather not argue. https://t.co/GdmOHHzym2
RT @robsica: "How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm" (https://t.co/g95D614gZj) @evopsychscience https://t.co/Qf9rfKPAr8
RT @robsica: "How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm" (https://t.co/g95D614gZj) @evopsychscience https://t.co/Qf9rfKPAr8
"How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm" (https://t.co/g95D614gZj) @evopsychscience
@clairlemon Just found this paper by Carl, which is quite interesting on quick read. Also explains why certain folks want to make him go away. But there may more that I don't know. https://t.co/yDfpyuAbWZ
The reality is—nature exists, and biologically reality has formed, it happened! There's no sneaking around science to "be kind," and attempts to do so, have had catastrophic social consequences (postmodernism). https://t.co/397TXUJVYQ
How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm https://t.co/bbKGCnfYCr
RT @KirkegaardEmil: @charlesmurray Did you read this one? https://t.co/NmJ0qSPCiF
RT @KirkegaardEmil: @charlesmurray Did you read this one? https://t.co/NmJ0qSPCiF
How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm https://t.co/1IoWuMFaFs By equating scientific statements with racism, those seeking to stifle debate commit the moralistic fallacy of concluding that a statement cannot be true if it has unpleasan
RT @KirkegaardEmil: @charlesmurray Did you read this one? https://t.co/NmJ0qSPCiF
@charlesmurray Did you read this one? https://t.co/NmJ0qSPCiF