↓ Skip to main content

Role of mesenchymal stem cells in meniscal repair

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Role of mesenchymal stem cells in meniscal repair
Published in
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/s40634-014-0012-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Angele, Richard Kujat, Matthias Koch, Johannes Zellner

Abstract

Meniscus integrity is the key for joint health of the knee. Therefore, the main goal of every meniscus treatment should be the maintenance of as much meniscus tissue as possible.Repair of meniscus tears can be achieved by meniscus suture. However, in a recently published meta-analysis, the long-term outcome of meniscus repair showed a mean failure rate of 24%.In a preclinical trial, locally applied mesenchymal stem cells produced differentiated meniscus-like tissue in meniscus tears indicating that mesenchymal-based cells, harvested from the bone marrow, enhance meniscus healing in critical-size meniscus tears.Symptomatic meniscus defects offer the option for meniscus transplantation with porous cell free biomaterials, when a complete meniscus rim is available. Cell-free biomaterials, which are actually in clinical application, reveal variable outcome in mid-term results from complete failure to regeneration with meniscus-like tissue.In several preclinical studies with different critical-size defects in the meniscus, the application of mesenchymal stem cells could significantly enhance meniscus regeneration compared to empty defects or to cell-free biomaterials.Regenerative treatment of meniscus with mesenchymal stem cells seems to be a promising approach to treat meniscal tears and defects. However it is still not clear, whether the stem cell effect is a direct action of the mesenchymal-based cells or is rather mediated by secretion of certain stimulating factors. The missing knowledge of the underlying mechanism is one of the reasons for regulatory burdens to permit these stem cell-based strategies in clinical practice. Other limitations are the necessity to expand cells prior to transplantation resulting in high treatment costs. Alternative treatment modalities, which use growth factors concentrated from peripheral blood aspirates or mononucleated cells concentrated from bone marrow aspirates, are currently in development in order to allow an attractive one-step procedure without the need for cell expansion in cultures and thus lower efforts and costs.In summary, Tissue Engineering of meniscus with mesenchymal based cells seems to be a promising approach to treat meniscal tears and defects in order to restore native meniscus tissue. However, advances of the technology are necessary to allow clinical application of this modern regenerative therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Unknown 60 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 37%
Engineering 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2015.
All research outputs
#18,407,102
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#247
of 325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,131
of 237,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 325 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them