Title |
Increased Risk of Surgery in Undiagnosed Celiac Disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, October 2001
|
DOI | 10.1023/a:1011919100259 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Carolina Ciacci, Raimondo Cavallaro, Rita Romano, Diana Scotti Galletta, Flora Labanca, Maria Marino, Mario Donisi, Gabriele Mazzacca |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 17 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Researcher | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 50% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2015.
All research outputs
#22,760,732
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#4,143
of 4,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,629
of 44,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.