↓ Skip to main content

High-consequence outcomes and internal disagreements: tell us more, please

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
High-consequence outcomes and internal disagreements: tell us more, please
Published in
Climatic Change, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0187-5
Authors

Robert H. Socolow

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
Switzerland 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 38 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Other 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Professor 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 33%
Environmental Science 14 33%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Unspecified 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 7 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#436,521
of 8,154,593 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#335
of 4,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,107
of 81,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#8
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,154,593 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.