↓ Skip to main content

Childhood Pneumonia Screener: a concept

Overview of attention for article published in pneumonia, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

3 tweeters

Readers on

6 Mendeley
Childhood Pneumonia Screener: a concept
Published in
pneumonia, July 2016
DOI 10.15172/pneu.2015.6/646
Pubmed ID

Jukka Rasanen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 33%
Other 1 17%
Professor 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Computer Science 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2015.
All research outputs
of 5,114,553 outputs
Outputs from pneumonia
of 16 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 153,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from pneumonia
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,114,553 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 60th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one scored the same or higher as 12 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them