↓ Skip to main content

Bilateral endogenous endophthalmitis caused by vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis in a neonate

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Bilateral endogenous endophthalmitis caused by vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis in a neonate
Published in
Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12348-015-0039-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nidhi Relhan, Thomas Albini, Avinash Pathengay, Harry W Flynn

Abstract

Neonatal bilateral endogenous endophthalmitis is rare and often results in devastating visual outcome. An 18-day-old neonate presented with whitening of the cornea in the left eye. The child was examined under anesthesia, and a diagnosis of bilateral endogenous endophthalmitis was made. Vitreous biopsy from the left eye showed no growth. Blood samples showed growth of Staphylococcus epidermidis which was multidrug resistant (including vancomycin) but sensitive to piperacillin-tazobactam. The patient was managed with bilateral intravitreal injections of piperacillin-tazobactam and systemic cefpodoxime. Systemic and topical antibiotics were given for 3 and 8 weeks, respectively, and infection was controlled. At 2-year follow-up, the right eye is fixing and following to light with clear view of the fundus and the left eye has a clear cornea with red glow of the fundus. Vancomycin-resistant S. epidermidis may be a cause of endogenous endophthalmitis. Intravitreal piperacillin-tazobactam and systemic cefpodoxime were used to eliminate the infection in this neonate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 26%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 67%
Unspecified 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 6 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2015.
All research outputs
#20,268,102
of 22,799,071 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection
#138
of 185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,269
of 264,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,799,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 185 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.