Title |
Parasympathetic reactivation after maximal CPET depends on exercise modality and resting vagal activity in healthy men
|
---|---|
Published in |
SpringerPlus, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40064-015-0882-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Felipe A Cunha, Adrian W Midgley, Thiago Gonçalves, Pedro P Soares, Paulo Farinatti |
Abstract |
The main purpose of this study was to investigate parasympathetic reactivation of the heart [evaluated through heart rate recovery (HRR) and HR variability (HRV)] after maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) using three different exercise modalities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 57% |
Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 96 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 7% |
Other | 26 | 25% |
Unknown | 15 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 36 | 35% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Engineering | 3 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 15% |
Unknown | 23 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2022.
All research outputs
#6,286,308
of 23,283,373 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#374
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,812
of 256,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#15
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,283,373 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.