↓ Skip to main content

An in vitro study on the effect of an oscillating stripping method on enamel roughness

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Orthodontics, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
An in vitro study on the effect of an oscillating stripping method on enamel roughness
Published in
Progress in Orthodontics, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40510-014-0071-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Baumgartner, Anna Iliadi, Theodore Eliades, George Eliades

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess the changes in enamel roughness parameters before and after stripping with an oscillating diamond strip system.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 11 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 48%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Unknown 12 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2015.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Orthodontics
#220
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#314,165
of 366,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Orthodontics
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.