| Title |
An in vitro study on the effect of an oscillating stripping method on enamel roughness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Progress in Orthodontics, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40510-014-0071-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefan Baumgartner, Anna Iliadi, Theodore Eliades, George Eliades |
| Abstract |
The aim of the present study was to assess the changes in enamel roughness parameters before and after stripping with an oscillating diamond strip system. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 46% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2015.
All research outputs
#20,265,771
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Orthodontics
#203
of 233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,908
of 357,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Orthodontics
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 233 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.