↓ Skip to main content

An in vitro study on the effect of an oscillating stripping method on enamel roughness

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Orthodontics, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
An in vitro study on the effect of an oscillating stripping method on enamel roughness
Published in
Progress in Orthodontics, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40510-014-0071-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Baumgartner, Anna Iliadi, Theodore Eliades, George Eliades

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess the changes in enamel roughness parameters before and after stripping with an oscillating diamond strip system.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 9 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 50%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Unknown 10 45%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2015.
All research outputs
#11,059,103
of 12,440,542 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Orthodontics
#166
of 182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,916
of 219,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Orthodontics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,440,542 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 182 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them